ArticleScientific reports2026
A combined experimental and DEM study on the mechanical and failure characteristics of fissured sandstone under complex stress conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In geotechnical engineering, fissured sandstone is frequently subjected to cyclic loading-unloading under complex construction conditions. Its mechanical properties and catastrophic failure characteristics directly influence the stability and safety of engineering structures. The mechanical behavior and failure mechanism of fissured sandstone under uniaxial and biaxial cyclic loading-unloading were studied using laboratory experiments, CT scanning, and numerical simulations. First, uniaxial compression experiments on intact and fissured sandstone specimens were conducted to obtain the stress-strain responses and peak strengths, providing the basis for subsequent numerical model calibration. This was followed by uniaxial cyclic loading-unloading experiments on the fissured specimens. By combining CT scanning and numerical simulation, the fissure evolution process was revealed from a macro-meso perspective. The reliability of the numerical model was verified. Based on the validated model, biaxial cyclic loading-unloading simulations were further carried out to investigate the mechanical responses and failure characteristics of fissured sandstone under complex stress conditions. Under uniaxial cyclic loading-unloading, the peak strength and elastic modulus ascended as the fissure angle grew, while crack initiation stress a trend of first decreasing and then increasing. Moreover, the extent of rock damage increased with the fissure angle. Under biaxial cyclic loading-unloading, an increase in fissure angle does not significantly change the peak strength and elastic modulus of the specimens but aggravates the failure dominated by shear. Compared with uniaxial cyclic loading-unloading, specimens subjected to biaxial cyclic loading-unloading exhibited higher crack initiation stresses, more extensive crack propagation, and more severe damage at the same fissure angle. The findings of this study provide theoretical support for the stability assessment and failure analysis of fissured rock masses under cyclic loading-unloading conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.