ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2026
Spatiotemporal analysis of reactive oxygen species using specific activity-based sensing fluorescent imaging probes.
Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal visualization of superoxide in diabetic nephropathy via an activatable fluorescent probe.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- The interaction between oxidative stress and Schwann cells.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxidative stress, driven by reactive oxygen species (ROS), is implicated in numerous diseases. ROS are vital for redox signalling and homeostasis but can damage proteins, lipids and nucleic acids, compromising cellular health and contributing to disease progression. ROS functions are governed by their spatiotemporal distribution within cells and organisms; however, their mechanisms of action remain insufficiently understood, highlighting the compelling need for accurate ROS detection methods. In this context, fluorescence imaging has emerged as a powerful tool for real-time ROS detection. Effective fluorescence probes for ROS feature high specificity and sensitivity, enable imaging within subcellular organelles, support dynamic and reversible imaging and/or allow simultaneous detection of multiple molecules. Despite many advances, ROS imaging remains challenging. This Review provides guidelines for developing reliable fluorescent probes for ROS detection in cells and in vivo, using representative examples of activity-based sensing to aid researchers in improving ROS monitoring to advance research across biology and medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42236877What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.