Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42236867›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Upper Blepharoplasty Under Anticoagulant or Antiplatelet Therapy: Is Safety Still a Concern?

Juan A Viscardi, Salvatore Giordano

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Juan A ViscardiDepartment of Plastic and General Surgery, Turku University Hospital and The University of Turku, Turku, Finland. juan.viscardi@hug.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1547-1668
Salvatore GiordanoDepartment of Plastic and General Surgery, Turku University Hospital and The University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDermatochalasis is defined as a skin excess in the upper or lower eyelid which may be associated with orbital fat prolapse, lacrimal gland prolapse, and involutional blepharoptosis. Upper blepharoplasty is the gold-standard procedure for correcting dermatochalasis and is the third most common cosmetic surgery performed in the United States. However, it is frequently performed on elderly patients, who are often ongoing anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy. Due to the associated elevated risk of bleeding, it remains unclear whether upper blepharoplasty can be safely performed in this patient population. This study aimed to investigate the safety of upper blepharoplasty in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective comparative study was conducted on 392 consecutive patients who underwent upper blepharoplasty for dermatochalasis at a single academic center over a three-year period. Patients with a history of prior eyelid or orbital surgery were excluded. The cohort was stratified into two groups: a study group of 100 patients on anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy (including aspirin, warfarin, and apixaban) and a control group of 292 patients not on such therapy. Postoperative complications, clinical outcomes, and satisfaction scores (from both patients and surgeons) were compared between the groups.

resultsBaseline characteristics differed significantly between groups, with patients on anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy being older and having higher comorbidity rates. Operative time, estimated blood loss, time to return to work, and follow-up duration were comparable. The overall complication rate was not significantly different between the antithrombotic and control groups (6.0% vs. 3.5%, p=0.380). Notably, no major bleeding events occurred. The incidence of ecchymosis requiring extended observation was low and not significantly different (1.0% vs. 0.0%, p=0.573). Patient-reported and surgeon-assessed satisfaction scores were high and similar between groups. Reoperation rates were also equivalent. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, no variable was identified as a significant independent predictor of complications; however, hypertension demonstrated the highest odds ratio (OR 2.9, 95% CI 0.29-28.56, p=0.370).

conclusionsUpper blepharoplasty appears to be safely performed in carefully selected patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. In this retrospective cohort, continuation of antithrombotic therapy was not associated with an increased rate of detected complications compared with controls. These findings support the feasibility of maintaining therapy in appropriately selected cases, although larger prospective studies are required to confirm these observations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsBlepharoplastyPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAnticoagulationAntiplatelet therapyBleeding-related complicationsBlepharoplastyDermatochalasisUpper eyelid

Identifiers

PMID42236867
PMCPMC13433642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.