Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42236849›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Federated MobileNetV2 with ensemble meta-learning for privacy-preserving brain tumor classification.

Menali Paul, Ankitesh Tiwari, Bhavesh Barmashe, Kalpana Rai, Vikas Singh Panwar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Menali PaulDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Sagar Institute of Research and Technology (SIRT), Bhopal, India.
Ankitesh TiwariDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Sagar Institute of Research and Technology (SIRT), Bhopal, India.
Bhavesh BarmasheDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Sagar Institute of Research and Technology (SIRT), Bhopal, India.
Kalpana RaiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Sagar Institute of Research and Technology (SIRT), Bhopal, India.
Vikas Singh PanwarManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. vikas.panwar@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of brain tumors from MRI images is very crucial for the selection of an appropriate treatment. However, the existing solution has issues with privacy and data sharing. To address this challenge, this paper proposes the use of federated learning. The proposed solution employs a light convolutional backbone and some adaptive local meta-learners. The proposed solution employs MobileNetV2 as the feature extractor. This is fine-tuned for many clients using a combination of FedAvg and FedProx regularization. Each client also trains a few meta-learners (MLP, SVM, and ELM) using the local feature embeddings, enabling people to obtain personalized predictions without sharing their private information. For inference, the framework supports both probability-level averaging across client ensembles and deployable single-client prediction using only the local meta-learners of one client. On the Brain Tumor MRI Dataset, containing 7023 image slices across glioma, meningioma, no tumor, and pituitary classes, the proposed framework achieved a maximum observed accuracy of 99.57%. Across four repeated runs, it achieved 99.29% +/- 0.20% accuracy with a 95% confidence interval of 98.97% to 99.61%, while maintaining strong macro-F1 performance and a macro-average ROC-AUC of 0.998690. Under the same preprocessing and split protocol, it outperformed internally reimplemented CNN+FedAvg and CNN+FedAvg+FedProx baselines and preserved near-centralized ROC-AUC performance. Communication analysis showed that exchanging the MobileNetV2 backbone required 149.89 MB per round for five clients, corresponding to an 83.34% reduction relative to a ResNet-50 backbone.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsConvolutional Neural NetworksFederated LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain tumor classificationConvergence analysisEnsemble meta-learningFedAvgFederated learningFedProxMedical imagingMobileNetV2Privacy-preserving deep learning

Identifiers

PMID42236849
PMCPMC13473597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.