ArticleScientific reports2026
Sulfoxaflor reduces food intake and learning efficiency of solitary Osmia bicornis bees.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bees in agroecosystems can be exposed to multiple pesticides, such as insecticides and fungicides, but potential sub-lethal consequences on fitness-relevant endpoints like food intake, foraging performance and learning efficiency remain poorly understood. The insecticide sulfoxaflor is used as alternative to neonicotinoid insecticides, however, its impacts alone or in combination with other pesticides on foraging and learning of solitary bees are largely unknown. We conducted experiments with solitary Osmia bicornis bees to investigate the effects of field-realistic doses of sulfoxaflor alone or in combination with the fungicide azoxystrobin on female bees' food intake in the laboratory and their learning efficiency and foraging performance on artificial flowers. We found that sulfoxaflor lowered the intake of sugar solution on average by 23.8% and interacted antagonistically with azoxystrobin. Moreover, bees exposed to sulfoxaflor learned to discriminate between rewarding and non-rewarding flower colours less efficiently. However, other aspects of foraging performance were not negatively affected by the investigated pesticides. These findings suggest that field-realistic exposure to sulfoxaflor can impair food intake and learning efficiency of O. bicornis, thereby pointing out mechanistic sub-lethal pathways that may lead to a reduced fitness and harmful consequences on population dynamics of solitary bees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.