ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-driven prediction of mechanical properties of lightweight concrete based on experimental data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lightweight concrete (LWC) is increasingly used in structural and non-structural applications due to its ability to reduce self-weight while maintaining adequate mechanical performance. However, predicting the mechanical behavior of EPS-based lightweight concrete remains challenging because of the complex and nonlinear interactions between mix composition, density, curing age, and aggregate-matrix characteristics. This study proposes an integrated experimental and machine learning-based framework to predict the mechanical properties of lightweight concrete incorporating expanded polystyrene (EPS) particles (Addipor 55) as a partial volumetric replacement of natural coarse aggregate. An experimental program was conducted using EPS replacement levels ranging from 0 to 500 L/m³, combined with a fixed silica fume content of 60 kg/m³ and a polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer at a constant water-cement ratio of 0.35. Compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and density were measured at curing ages of 3, 7, and 28 days. The results showed a systematic reduction in density from 2380 kg/m³ for the control mix to 1720 kg/m³ at the highest EPS content. The 28-day compressive strength decreased from 41.2 MPa to 28.6 MPa, while the splitting tensile strength declined from 4.30 MPa to 2.65 MPa. To enhance model robustness, the experimental dataset was expanded using a physically constrained data augmentation approach based on experimentally observed trends. An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model was then developed and validated using independent data subsets, demonstrating excellent predictive performance with coefficients of determination (R²) of approximately 0.998 for both compressive and splitting tensile strengths. The proposed ANN model, supported by a graphical user interface (GUI), provides a reliable and efficient tool for predicting the mechanical performance of EPS-based lightweight concrete and optimizing mix design with reduced experimental effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.