Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42236795›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A multi-layer airport security framework using YOLO-based X-ray detection, video anomaly analysis, IoT sensor monitoring and blockchain logging.

T Shobha, R Rashmi, L R Chaitanya, C V Medhini, R J Chandana, Sumukh P Gowda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T ShobhaDepartment of Information Science and Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bull Temple Road, Bengaluru, KA, 560019, India. shobha.ise@bmsce.ac.in.
R RashmiDepartment of Information Science and Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bull Temple Road, Bengaluru, KA, 560019, India.
L R ChaitanyaDepartment of Information Science and Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bull Temple Road, Bengaluru, KA, 560019, India.
C V MedhiniDepartment of Information Science and Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bull Temple Road, Bengaluru, KA, 560019, India.
R J ChandanaDepartment of Information Science and Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bull Temple Road, Bengaluru, KA, 560019, India.
Sumukh P GowdaDepartment of Information Science and Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bull Temple Road, Bengaluru, KA, 560019, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Security screening systems require reliable and real-time detection of threats in complex X-ray imagery and surrounding environments. Manual inspection of baggage images is often a overhead due to operator fatigue, cluttered objects and overlapping items. Recent advances in deep learning and intelligent sensing technologies provide opportunities for automated threat detection in such environments. In this work, we propose a multi-layer airport security framework integrating three complementary detection modules: YOLO-based X-ray prohibited-item detection, video anomaly detection for behavioural monitoring, and IoT-based environmental anomaly sensing. In addition to this, a blockchain-secured logging mechanism is incorporated to ensure tamper-proof storage of security events. The X-ray detection module employs YOLOv11-s trained on the CLCXray dataset to identify prohibited items in baggage. Behavioural anomalies in surveillance footage are detected using a 3D-CNN autoencoder, while environmental anomalies from IoT sensors are identified using an LSTM autoencoder. Outputs from these modules are integrated using a unified multimodal risk scoring mechanism. Experimental results demonstrate that YOLOv11-s achieves mAP[Formula: see text] of 78.91% and YOLOv8-s achieves mAP[Formula: see text] of 78.49% with strong detection reliability across varying confidence thresholds, both the models have comparable performance and either of it could be chosen. The IoT anomaly detection produces reconstruction errors in the range of 0.019-0.03, with anomalies identified when the error exceeds a threshold of 0.041 and for video anomaly its 0.0040-0.00685. The proposed multimodal fusion module achieves ROC-AUC score of 0.864, which demonstrated an improved detection reliability compared to individual modalities. Also, the framework achieves an average detection latency of 0.014 ms per event, while the blockchain logging module records security events with an average latency of 0.179 ms and supports up to 5723.47 transactions per second. These results demonstrate that the proposed framework provides an effective, scalable, and secure solution for automated airport security monitoring systems.

Indexed as

Blockchain loggingCLCXrayIoTVideo anomaly detectionX-ray prohibited item detectionYOLO

Identifiers

PMID42236795
PMCPMC13385621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.