ArticleScientific reports2026
Small extracellular vesicles promote cell survival and neuritogenesis in vitro in a manner dependent on dosage and cell of origin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) possess a diverse secretome with well-established neuroprotective effects. Form among the materiel released by these cells, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have gained particular interest lately, owing to their good safety profile, stability, and relative ease of use as a cell-free therapy. These lipid-enclosed nano-carriers can significantly alter the survival of recipient cells through the delivery of a wide variety of signalling molecules, the exact composition of which is highly dependent on the type, age, and environment of the donor cells. Glaucoma is a chronic progressive optic neuropathy characterised by the loss of Retinal Ganglion Cells whose axons make up the optic nerve. Preservation of these neurons via the administration of the right EVs represents a promising approach for slowing disease progression, thereby preventing vision loss. Here, we evaluate and compare the protective and neuritogenic potential of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), a subset of EVs with a diameter smaller than 220 nm, from six different cell types using a rodent in vitro model of RGC degeneration. Our findings showed that Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells release the most potent sEVs, with Bone Marrow being a close second. EVs released by cells of the Umbilical Cord, Dental Pulp, Dermal Fibroblasts, and an Oral Mucosal Lamina Propria-Progenitor cells did not have an observable benefit. Thus, our study provides greater insight into how the efficacy of different EVs compares to each other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.