ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive confidence ensemble reranking for reliable knowledge-intensive question answering.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern question answering systems rely on advanced neural architectures to bridge the semantic gap between natural language queries and relevant textual evidence. However, single-model approaches often struggle to capture diverse linguistic variations, while traditional ensemble methods suffer from high computational complexity and static model combination strategies. Existing answer reranking systems lack adaptive mechanisms to dynamically adjust model contributions based on question characteristics, limiting their effectiveness across knowledge-intensive tasks. This study proposes an adaptive confidence ensemble reranking framework designed to improve reliability and efficiency in knowledge-intensive question answering. The proposed approach integrates dual-encoder retrieval with a cross-encoder ensemble of BERT, RoBERTa, and DeBERTa models, combined through an instance-aware adaptive confidence weighting mechanism. The framework dynamically adjusts model contributions using cross-entropy-based evaluation to optimize answer ranking performance while maintaining computational feasibility. Experimental results demonstrate significant performance improvements across multiple benchmark datasets, including a 9.3% increase in mean average precision on MS MARCO, a 2.1% gain on WikiQA, and a 1.2% improvement on TREC-QA. These findings highlight the effectiveness of the proposed method in enhancing reliability and accuracy across diverse knowledge-intensive question answering scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.