Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42236750›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A virtual reality system for court interpreting education and its effects on motivation and fluency based on self determination theory.

Chan-In Sio, Andrew K F Cheung, Yao Yao, Rui Xie, Xian Wang, Chi Sun, Lik-Hang Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chan-In SioThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Andrew K F CheungThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Yao YaoThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Rui XieBeijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China.
Xian WangThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Chi SunThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Lik-Hang LeeThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China. lik-hang.lee@polyu.edu.hk.

Funding

Collaborative research project P0047685Hong Kong Polytechnic University's Start-up Fund for New Recruits P0046056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Court interpreting is critical for ensuring fairness in the justice system. However, traditional training methods often lack engagement and fail to provide interpreters with sufficient hands-on experience, relying heavily on passive learning approaches. To address these limitations, we designed and implemented MetaCourt, a virtual reality (VR) environment for court interpreting training. Using a small-scale participatory design approach, we developed an immersive platform that aligns with the Player Experience of Needs Satisfaction (PENS) model under self-determination theory. We recruited 21 undergraduate interpreting students to evaluate MetaCourt’s effectiveness. Results showed that the VR environment significantly enhanced fluency compared to traditional digital methods, while accuracy remained consistent. PENS analysis revealed high levels of autonomy, intuitive controls, and presence, supporting learners’ psychological needs. Additionally, NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and Igroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ) surveys indicated reduced mental workload and acceptable user experiences, reinforcing MetaCourt’s usability. This study represents the first integration of virtual environments with the PENS paradigm in court interpreting training. The findings highlight MetaCourt’s potential to improve fluency, enhance virtual learning experiences, and address critical gaps in traditional training, offering a promising alternative for advancing court interpreting education.

Indexed as

Immersive learningMetaversePlayer Experience of Needs Satisfaction (PENS)Self-Determination Theory (STD)Virtual Reality (VR)

Identifiers

PMID42236750
PMCPMC13233905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.