ArticleScientific reports2026
A virtual reality system for court interpreting education and its effects on motivation and fluency based on self determination theory.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Court interpreting is critical for ensuring fairness in the justice system. However, traditional training methods often lack engagement and fail to provide interpreters with sufficient hands-on experience, relying heavily on passive learning approaches. To address these limitations, we designed and implemented MetaCourt, a virtual reality (VR) environment for court interpreting training. Using a small-scale participatory design approach, we developed an immersive platform that aligns with the Player Experience of Needs Satisfaction (PENS) model under self-determination theory. We recruited 21 undergraduate interpreting students to evaluate MetaCourt’s effectiveness. Results showed that the VR environment significantly enhanced fluency compared to traditional digital methods, while accuracy remained consistent. PENS analysis revealed high levels of autonomy, intuitive controls, and presence, supporting learners’ psychological needs. Additionally, NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and Igroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ) surveys indicated reduced mental workload and acceptable user experiences, reinforcing MetaCourt’s usability. This study represents the first integration of virtual environments with the PENS paradigm in court interpreting training. The findings highlight MetaCourt’s potential to improve fluency, enhance virtual learning experiences, and address critical gaps in traditional training, offering a promising alternative for advancing court interpreting education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.