Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42236724›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2026

A fundamental trade-off among noise suppression, response sensitivity and speed in biological feedback networks.

Ka Kit Kong, Feng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ka Kit KongSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Feng LiuKey Laboratory of Hebei Province for Molecular Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, School of Health Science & Biomedical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China. liufeng@hebut.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological regulatory networks rely on feedback control to suppress intrinsic noise while remaining sensitive and responsive to external signals, yet whether these objectives can be achieved simultaneously remains unclear. Here, we show that biological feedback networks face an unavoidable constraint: intrinsic fluctuations cannot be arbitrarily suppressed without sacrificing response sensitivity or slowing response speed via feedback control. Using a general framework for stochastic feedback dynamics, we derive a fundamental trade-off that limits how these three performance objectives can be jointly optimized. Theoretical results and numerical simulations demonstrate that this constraint persists across high-dimensional systems. We further show that nonequilibrium, non-gradient dynamics, which are prevalent in biological regulation, can partially relax but never eliminate this limitation, reducing the minimal cost of noise suppression by at most a factor of two. We validate our theory using a biologically motivated activator-inhibitor feedback motif. Together, our results elucidate a fundamental limitation of feedback control in enhancing the information transmission capacity of biological regulatory networks.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalComputer SimulationGene Regulatory NetworksModels, BiologicalSignal TransductionStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID42236724
PMCPMC13538697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.