ArticleNature communications2026
O-SNAP uncovers nanoscale chromatin remodeling in dedifferentiation and stress responses.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- O-SNAP uncovers nanoscale chromatin remodeling in dedifferentiation and stress responses.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The multi-scale organization of chromatin underlies gene regulation and cell identity, yet how nuclear architecture remodels during cell state transitions remains poorly understood. Here, we use single-molecule localization microscopy and a comprehensive analytical framework we call O-SNAP to reveal distinct chromatin remodeling trajectories in two biological contexts: dedifferentiation in chondrocytes and nuclear oxidative stress-induced remodeling in mammary epithelial cells. Conventional analyses of single-molecule localization microscopy chromatin images based on qualitative inspection or simple metrics, such as chromatin domain size, fail to capture the subtle chromatin transitions in both contexts. In contrast, O-SNAP quantitatively integrates and compares 144 spatial features extracted from single-molecule localization microscopy data, allowing machine-learning based classification of nuclear states and systematic downstream analyses such as feature selection, volcano plots, and feature set enrichment analysis to determine which spatial features most strongly drive classification results. Our analysis shows that in chondrocytes, in vitro passaging drives heterochromatin formation at late passages, whereas intermediate passages exhibit heterogeneous chromatin remodeling. In contrast, in mammary epithelial cells, nuclear oxidative stress leads to chromatin decompaction specifically in cells overexpressing the oxidation-sensitive histone H3.1 variant. Together, these findings demonstrate that integrated, multiscale spatial features of chromatin are sufficient to robustly discriminate distinct cellular states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.