ArticlePhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2026
State of darkness protection in strategic lighting documents of 10 European cities.
Article in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimizing the adverse effects of lighting and enabling safe and justified darkness are prerequisites for sustainable urban lighting. In this paper, we analyse the justifications and measures that 10 European cities have documented for protecting darkness in their strategic lighting documents such as lighting masterplans. Our aim is to form an overview of the state of darkness protection in European urban settings at the beginning of the 2020s. We hope that the situational overview helps the existing good practices to disseminate and supports steering of measures and development work related to urban lighting and darkness protection at different levels of governance and in research. After exploration of a larger set of material, ten cities and 1-2 documents from each were selected for thematic analysis: three Finnish cities, four other cities of similar size in the northern half of Europe and three more southern European cities. The most common justifications given by the cities for protecting darkness were ecological, relating to biodiversity, ecosystems and species of nature. Human-centred justifications included perspectives of health, well-being and comfort, cultural significance of darkness, and the notion that protecting darkness also creates more legible urban space. The cities present a wide variety of measures for protecting and restoring darkness and mitigating the harmful effects of lighting. Thematic outline and several categories are presented with examples in the article. To conclude, many good practices already exist, and cities would benefit from learning from each other. It seems important to raise awareness about the values of darkness, as well as of solutions that integrate the needs for lighting with the needs for darkness. The analysis raises further research questions on the use and usability of strategic lighting documents and long-term strategic planning to restore and protect urban darkness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42236656What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.