Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42236628›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Procedural trial generation for cognitive assessment: An executive function planning task.

Caroline Dakoure, Alexandre Caron, Kajamathy Subramaniam, Delphine Raucher-Chéné, Geneviève Sauvé, Élisabeth Thibaudeau, Katie M Lavigne

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caroline DakoureDouglas Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3195-3643
Alexandre CaronDouglas Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5772-4382
Kajamathy SubramaniamDouglas Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6148-7807
Delphine Raucher-ChénéDouglas Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5663-4454
Geneviève SauvéDouglas Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8140-2578
Élisabeth ThibaudeauSchool of Psychology, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5603-0856
Katie M LavigneDouglas Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. katie.lavigne@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-691X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce an approach for the computational generation of new trials to support the design of cognitive assessments and demonstrate the methodology through a novel executive functioning planning task. Drawing inspiration from procedural content generation (PCG; i.e., computationally creating new content based on a defined set of rules) in gaming, we created a scalable and adaptable method for generating a variety of experimental trials. Our exemplary task, influenced by traditional cognitive measures and digital puzzle games, involves moving colored blocks to form matches and clear the screen, assessing planning. The task development process is detailed from designing mockups through to coding, making the task accessible online, and conducting usability and functional testing. The procedural generation technique, used to automatically generate trials for the task, followed a generate-and-test methodology. The process began with the pseudo-random creation of puzzles (i.e., generate), then a solving algorithm explored the generated configurations and retained only the solvable puzzles (i.e., test). This approach automatically produced many diverse trials for our task. We discuss future directions for PCG in cognitive assessment, including the potential exploration of advanced algorithms to further optimize trial generation. We also provide guidelines for digital cognitive task development and procedural trial generation in cognitive assessment, including incorporating psychometric validation and adaptive difficulty, to facilitate the generation of many high-quality trials for a broad range of applications, including cognitive intervention studies and cognitive ecological momentary assessment.

Indexed as

CognitionExecutive FunctionNeuropsychological TestsAlgorithmsHumansAutomationCognitionDigital assessmentProcedural content generationPsychoPyPuzzle generation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.