ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Procedural trial generation for cognitive assessment: An executive function planning task.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce an approach for the computational generation of new trials to support the design of cognitive assessments and demonstrate the methodology through a novel executive functioning planning task. Drawing inspiration from procedural content generation (PCG; i.e., computationally creating new content based on a defined set of rules) in gaming, we created a scalable and adaptable method for generating a variety of experimental trials. Our exemplary task, influenced by traditional cognitive measures and digital puzzle games, involves moving colored blocks to form matches and clear the screen, assessing planning. The task development process is detailed from designing mockups through to coding, making the task accessible online, and conducting usability and functional testing. The procedural generation technique, used to automatically generate trials for the task, followed a generate-and-test methodology. The process began with the pseudo-random creation of puzzles (i.e., generate), then a solving algorithm explored the generated configurations and retained only the solvable puzzles (i.e., test). This approach automatically produced many diverse trials for our task. We discuss future directions for PCG in cognitive assessment, including the potential exploration of advanced algorithms to further optimize trial generation. We also provide guidelines for digital cognitive task development and procedural trial generation in cognitive assessment, including incorporating psychometric validation and adaptive difficulty, to facilitate the generation of many high-quality trials for a broad range of applications, including cognitive intervention studies and cognitive ecological momentary assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42236628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.