Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42236607›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Preliminary feedback from adult oncology clinic providers on a psychosocial screening tool for young adult patients with cancer.

Michael W Wrucke, Grace Rickey, Molin Shi, Deborah Z Shear, Sarah E Taghavi, Victoria Cantu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael W Wrucke *Moncrief Cancer Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, 400 West Magnolia Ave, 76104, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5723-7489
Grace Rickey *Moncrief Cancer Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, 400 West Magnolia Ave, 76104, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9597-2586
Molin ShiMoncrief Cancer Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, 400 West Magnolia Ave, 76104, USA. molin.shi@utsouthwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-4112
Deborah Z ShearMoncrief Cancer Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, 400 West Magnolia Ave, 76104, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2609-4215
Sarah E TaghaviMoncrief Cancer Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, 400 West Magnolia Ave, 76104, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6893-5342
Victoria CantuMoncrief Cancer Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, 400 West Magnolia Ave, 76104, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4920-6281

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePsychosocial screening integration has been recognized as a standard of care, though successful implementation relies heavily on provider engagement. The current study examined provider perceptions on integrating a psychosocial screening tool as part of the standard of care at a comprehensive cancer center that primarily serves patients with hematologic malignancies.

methodsThe Adolescent and Young Adult Psycho-Oncology Screening Tool (AYA-POST) or Adolescent and Young Adult Psycho-Oncology Survivorship Screening Tool (AYA-S-POST) was administered to patients in the Transplant and Cellular Therapies (TCT) clinic as part of a broader program development initiative. Research personnel then designed a survey to assess provider perceptions of integrating the AYA screening tool into clinical care. Survey items were adapted from a prior study. Information regarding provider perceptions of integrating age-appropriate psychosocial screening was then analyzed.

resultsFourteen of the eligible 20 providers (eight physicians and six APPs) provided feedback on the AYA screening tool. A total of 13 providers (92.9%) had discussed the screener during a medical visit with a YA patient. Overall, TCT providers had neutral to positive perceptions of the AYA screening tool.

conclusionResults of the current study show that providers in a high-volume adult oncology clinic have generally positive views of integrating an age-appropriate psychosocial screening at point of care. With acceptability from providers, routinely screening YAs could move toward more consistently addressing their unmet needs and enhancing the quality of their oncology care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHematologic NeoplasmsMass ScreeningNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultFeedbackFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAge-appropriate psychosocial screeningProvider perceptionsQuality-of-careRoutine standard of care screeningYoung adult oncology

Identifiers

PMID42236607
PMCPMC13233649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.