ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Detection and classification of lymphoma from cell-free methylome data.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosing lymphoma traditionally relies on invasive tissue biopsies, which can yield insufficient material for histopathological evaluation and carry a risk of complications. Minimally invasive assessment of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma offers a promising alternative for lymphoma detection that could aid the rapid evaluation of malignant vs. benign lymphadenopathy. Here, we examine the methylome of plasma samples from 165 lymphoma patients and 47 controls using cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq). Differential methylation analysis of a discovery cohort (142 out of 212 samples) revealed 13,897 hypermethylated genomic regions in lymphoma cases, which were subsequently used for classification using regularized binomial generalized linear models. In a validation cohort (70 samples), we identified lymphomas with an accuracy of 0.89, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.90 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.87. cfDNA methylation scores were significantly associated with orthogonal measures of cfDNA tumor burden, stage, and clinical outcomes. Our results highlight the feasibility of cfDNA methylation profiling as a sensitive and minimally invasive method for detecting lymphoma.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.