ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimizing environmental covariates for digital mapping of soil organic carbon in Hunan Province, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC) is widely recognized as a fundamental indicator of soil fertility, ecosystem functioning, and overall soil health. Effective land management requires continuous monitoring of SOC variations through modern technological approaches. In this study, 477 soil samples were meticulously collected and analyzed for SOC content in the laboratory. Terrain attributes and spectral indices were then derived from satellite data. Machine learning models, including support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and random forest (RF), were employed to predict SOC content. To improve computational efficiency and model accuracy, the variance inflation factor (VIF) and Boruta's variable selection methods were applied, identifying the most relevant environmental covariates. Results demonstrated that only 5 out of 40 environmental covariates were optimal for SOC modeling. Using these selected covariates, the RF model achieved the highest prediction accuracy (R² = 0.84, RMSE = 0.069%, and PRD = 3.6%). The RF model effectively captured the inherent variability and complexity of soil properties, yielding precise and reliable SOC predictions. The results emphasize the capability of machine learning in predicting SOC levels, aiding in the enhancement of soil management strategies and agricultural planning. Ultimately, this study provides a foundation for integrating advanced predictive techniques to enhance SOC assessment in future study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.