ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrated femtosecond-laser workflow for decapsulation, delayering, and cross-sectioning of advanced package-on-package devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advanced packaging devices integrate multiple heterogeneous materials and components (e.g., mold compounds, redistribution/interposer structures, stacked memory, and logic dies) into compact assemblies whose failures can propagate into high-impact system-level outages. High-resolution, layer-by-layer 3D imaging is therefore essential for (i) failure analysis (FA) and root-cause determination, (ii) verification and validation (V&V) via as-designed versus as-built comparison, and (iii) security-focused inspection aimed at identifying unintended or malicious structural modifications. However, conventional approaches-mechanical polishing, chemical etching, and focused ion beam (FIB) delayering-are often slow, limited in precision, inconsistent over large areas, or difficult to scale for systematic workflows. In this work, we have shown that laser delayering can promise an effective alternative that is simultaneously fast and precise. Here, we demonstrate an integrated femtosecond-laser workflow for advanced package-on-package deprocessing that combines decapsulation, DRAM/component removal, sequential redistribution-layer exposure and removal, and targeted logic-die cross-sectioning on a single laser-processing platform. Process outcomes were validated using laser-scanning confocal microscopy for high-fidelity surface topography and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for microstructural assessment. The results demonstrate a practical, rapid, and reproducible pathway for advanced-package system deconstruction and design reconstruction workflows supporting FA, V&V, and hardware assurance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.