ArticleScientific reports2026
Prevalence, risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in equines in Egypt.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is a common commensal organism in both humans and animals, frequently colonizing the skin and nasal cavities of healthy individuals, although it can also cause a wide range of severe infections. The present study investigated the prevalence and risk factors of S. aureus in equines, along with antimicrobial resistance patterns of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates. The results revealed a prevalence of 38.6% in nasal samples collected from equines, highlighting the organism's significant presence and potential to cause infections in these animals. A genotypic prevalence of 8.2% was also recorded. Horses showed a significantly higher prevalence compared to donkeys and mules, indicating species-related differences in susceptibility and management practices. Risk factor analysis demonstrated higher infection rates in young animals, those in poor body condition, animals showing respiratory signs, and those with a history of prior antibiotic therapy. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of MRSA isolates revealed high resistance to cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and meropenem, indicating the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains. These findings emphasize the role of antimicrobial misuse and microbial adaptation in resistance development. Overall, the study highlights the epidemiological importance of S. aureus in equines and underscores the need for improved management, hygiene practices, and prudent antibiotic use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.