Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42236508›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Development and validation of the SuPr-10 questionnaire for suicidality assessment in primary care patients with depressive symptoms.

Carolin Haas, Philipp Sterner, Puya Younesi, Elena Wang, Gabriele Pitschel-Walz, Jochen Gensichen, Markus Bühner, Karoline Lukaschek, POKAL-Group

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carolin HaasInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. carolin.haas@unibw.de.
Philipp SternerPsychological Methods and Assessment, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Puya YounesiInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Elena WangDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Gabriele Pitschel-WalzInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jochen GensichenInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Markus BühnerPsychological Methods and Assessment, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Karoline LukaschekInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
POKAL-Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicidal ideation affects 10% of primary care patients. Although guidelines recommend screening, few tools are suitable for use in this setting, and protective factors are often overlooked. This study aimed to develop a brief questionnaire to assess suicidality in primary care. The Suicide Prevention for Primary Care Questionnaire (SuPr-10) was validated in 521 participants with a PHQ-9 score ≥ 6 across six subsamples. Its structure was analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, item analysis, and psychometric evaluation. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed via logistic regression and ROC analysis, and patient acceptance was measured in a follow-up survey. A two-factor structure with ten items was identified: I. protective scale (ω = .817) and II. risk scale (ω = .928), showing strong correlations with suicidality (r = -.529, .854) and depression (r = -.736, .626) scales. SuPr-10 showed acceptable discriminatory ability for identifying individuals with a history of suicide attempts (AUC = .765; 83% sensitivity, 56% specificity). It provides a structured assessment of suicidal tendencies and protective factors in primary care patients with depressive symptoms, supporting clinical decision-making and resource-focused communication. These findings are based on a clinically enriched, German-speaking sample, do not imply prospective prediction of suicidal behavior, and require validation in broader primary care populations.

Indexed as

DepressionSuicidal IdeationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CarePsychometricsROC CurveSuicide PreventionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42236508
PMCPMC13234288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.