ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and validation of the SuPr-10 questionnaire for suicidality assessment in primary care patients with depressive symptoms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of the SuPr-10 questionnaire for suicidality assessment in primary care patients with depressive symptoms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- PACIC: patient activation and problem solving not related to age in patients with depressive symptoms.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicidal ideation affects 10% of primary care patients. Although guidelines recommend screening, few tools are suitable for use in this setting, and protective factors are often overlooked. This study aimed to develop a brief questionnaire to assess suicidality in primary care. The Suicide Prevention for Primary Care Questionnaire (SuPr-10) was validated in 521 participants with a PHQ-9 score ≥ 6 across six subsamples. Its structure was analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, item analysis, and psychometric evaluation. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed via logistic regression and ROC analysis, and patient acceptance was measured in a follow-up survey. A two-factor structure with ten items was identified: I. protective scale (ω = .817) and II. risk scale (ω = .928), showing strong correlations with suicidality (r = -.529, .854) and depression (r = -.736, .626) scales. SuPr-10 showed acceptable discriminatory ability for identifying individuals with a history of suicide attempts (AUC = .765; 83% sensitivity, 56% specificity). It provides a structured assessment of suicidal tendencies and protective factors in primary care patients with depressive symptoms, supporting clinical decision-making and resource-focused communication. These findings are based on a clinically enriched, German-speaking sample, do not imply prospective prediction of suicidal behavior, and require validation in broader primary care populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.