Observational studyNature communications2026
Neural Response to Familiar Names Predicts Outcome of Comatose ICU Patients: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.
Observational study in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting the outcome of comatose patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) can inform decision making but remains challenging. Recent studies suggest that task-state electroencephalography (EEG) can detect covert cognition and facilitate patient prognosis. This study aimed to predict the outcome of comatose patients, by assessing covert processing of familiar names using a state-of-the-art EEG frequency tagging approach. Eighty-nine comatose patients following acute brain injury were recruited from five ICUs. Patients were presented with a rapid stream of familiar names and acoustically matched but unintelligible control sounds. EEG responses tracking the familiar names and control sounds were extracted in the frequency domain and utilised to predict the outcome of each patient, which was assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months post-injury using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE). Name-tracking EEG responses positively correlated with GOSE scores. A machine learning model integrating EEG responses and clinical characteristics achieved AUCs of 0.86, 0.88, and 0.86 in the test set, and 0.91, 0.90, and 0.85 in the external validation set, for predicting outcomes at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. These findings underscore that EEG assessment of residual processing of familiar names relates to patient outcomes and has the potential to predict outcome of comatose ICU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.