ArticleJournal of animal science2026
Fifty years of progress for beef cattle production in the United States.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many changes in feed production and the management and genetics of cattle have occurred over the past 50 years which affect the efficiency, productivity and environmental impacts of beef cattle production. Trends in feed and animal productivity were determined through regression of historical annual data with time. The Integrated Farm System Model, following life cycle assessment procedures, was used to assess the impact of these changes by modeling representative cattle operations throughout the US in 1972 and 2022. Improvements in yields of feed crops, animal management and genetics, machinery efficiency, and the production of resources such as fuel, electricity, and fertilizer have led to many reductions in the life cycle environmental impacts of beef cattle production. Fewer but larger cattle harvested in 2022 produced 23% more beef carcass weight than in 1972. Nearly the same total feed was consumed to produce beef in 2022 as used in 1972, but about 10% less forage and 37% more grain and byproduct feeds were fed. Increases in crop yields, particularly corn yields, led to a 14% reduction in cropland and 11% reduction in total land use over the 50-yr period. Other predicted improvements included a 27% reduction in blue water use, 26% reduction in fossil energy use, and 8% reduction in methane emissions. There was little change in total reactive N losses related to beef cattle production with a 33% increase in ammonia emissions offset by decreases in N denitrification, leaching and runoff losses. Considering the increase in animal weight produced, reductions per unit of carcass weight included 22% less feed, 29% less land, 42% less blue water, 41% less fossil energy, 27% less methane, and 21% less reactive N loss. A sensitivity analysis showed that these results were not influenced much by changes in our assumptions on past animal and pasture management. These improvements reflect the continuing trend of the U.S. cattle industry for increasing productivity and efficiency to produce a sustainable product that meets the growing demand for beef.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.