Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42236291›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2026

Navigating pelvic anatomy for exenteration: a clinical guide for radiologists.

Stephanie Nougaret, Verity Wood, Phillipe Rouanet, Arend G J Aalbers, Tamara Glyn, Damian Tolan, Doenja M J Lambregts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie NougaretDepartment of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, 34000 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6398-8648
Verity WoodDepartment of Radiology, Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora Waitaha, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, Canterbury, 8011, New Zealand.
Phillipe RouanetDepartment of Oncological Surgery, Montpellier Cancer Institute, 34000 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0415-3269
Arend G J AalbersSurgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tamara GlynDepartment of Surgery, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Damian TolanDepartment of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9895-9874
Doenja M J LambregtsDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2990-0099

Funding

European Research Council Starting 101077710Yorkshire Cancer Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a complex, potentially curative option for locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies in which achieving an R0 margin is paramount. This clinical review provides a pragmatic, anatomy-driven framework to optimize preoperative assessment and multidisciplinary planning. Using a compartment-based schema-central, anterior, posterior, and lateral-the article maps tumor spread to structures that determine technical feasibility and functional outcomes. For each compartment, surgical implications and reporting "pearls and pitfalls" are summarized to ensure radiological interpretation directly informs surgical decision-making. Special attention is given to differentiating tumor infiltration from post-treatment fibrosis, particularly following chemoradiotherapy, where diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging plays an important role in the attempt to differentiate residual disease from fibrosis and defining safe resection planes. The review outlines assessment of critical anatomical structures or variants that have implications for surgical planning or functional consequences for patients. In addition, reconstructive options and their imaging appearances are briefly discussed to aid postoperative assessment. Through detailed anatomical analysis and structured, compartment-based reporting, radiologists can enhance multidisciplinary communication, refine patient selection, anticipate morbidity, and ultimately increase the likelihood of achieving complete resection in pelvic exenteration.

Indexed as

Pelvic ExenterationPelvic NeoplasmsPelvisHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaginginterventional/methodslocalmagnetic resonance imagingneoplasm recurrencepelvic anatomypelvic exenterationpreoperative planningradiology

Identifiers

PMID42236291
PMCPMC13489399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.