ArticleHistopathology2026
Landscape of genetic alterations affecting cancer genes in primary and advanced malignant phyllodes tumours.
Article in Histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMalignant phyllodes tumours (MPT) are aggressive breast fibroepithelial neoplasms. Their rarity has limited their genetic characterization, and associations with genetic ancestry and progression drivers remain poorly understood. Prior studies suggest two evolutionary pathways according to MED12 mutational status. We sought to determine the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations in cancer genes in primary versus metastatic/recurrent MPTs, and according to MED12 mutational status and genetic ancestry. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analysed the paired tumour-normal targeting sequencing data (up to 505 cancer-related genes) of 31 MPTs (primary, n = 20; metastatic/recurrent, n = 11).
resultsMetastatic/recurrent MPTs harboured a numerically higher frequency of genetic alterations in CDKN2A/2B (55% vs. 25%). Moreover, analysis of an MPT case with paired primary and metastatic samples revealed a CDKN2A/2B homozygous deletion restricted to the metastatic sample, suggesting a role for CDKN2A/2B in progression. Compared with MED12-wild type MPTs, MED12-mutant MPTs had higher tumour mutation burden (P = 0.002), frequency of TERT promoter (82% vs. 35%; P = 0.02) and RB1 mutations (45% vs. 5%; P = 0.01). Genetic alterations in the PI3K pathway, including PIK3CA and PTEN, were only present in MED12-wild type MPTs, and absent in MED12-mutant cases (15% vs. 0%; P > 0.05). Furthermore, genetic alterations in EGFR were restricted to MPTs from patients of European genetic ancestry and absent in those of Asian ancestry (43% vs. 0%; P > 0.05).
conclusionsTaken together, the repertoire of genetic alterations in primary and metastatic/recurrent MPTs shows overlap, and CDKN2A/2B homozygous deletions may play a role in progression. Additionally, molecular profiles of MPTs may vary according to genetic ancestry and MED12 mutational status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.