Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42236170›Full record

ReviewMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2026

MR Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy and Primary Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Atsuko Fujihara, Takumi Shiraishi, Tsuyoshi Iwata, Takashi Ueda, Masatsugu Miyashita, Yumiko Saito, Yuta Inoue, Bunta Tokuda, Osamu Ukimura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Role of MRI in the Clinical Management of Urologic and Nephrological Disorders.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Atsuko FujiharaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Takumi ShiraishiDepartment of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Tsuyoshi IwataDepartment of Urology, Kyoto Min-iren Chuo Hospital, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Takashi UedaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Masatsugu MiyashitaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Yumiko SaitoDepartment of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuta InoueDepartment of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Bunta TokudaDepartment of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Osamu UkimuraDepartment of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in imaging diagnostics, particularly MRI, have enabled the visualization of clinically significant prostate cancer. Furthermore, advances in image-fusion technology have made it possible to accurately target these visualized lesions and obtain tissue samples through precise needle placement. These developments now enable systematic intraprostatic localization of clinically significant prostate cancer. Traditionally, standard treatment options for localized prostate cancer have involved whole-gland therapies, such as radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. Although these approaches provide excellent oncological control and favorable long-term outcomes, they are associated with treatment-related adverse events, including urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction, which can substantially impair quality of life. Focal therapy has emerged as a treatment strategy designed to address these limitations by selectively targeting only the clinically significant cancer within the prostate, thereby aiming to achieve a balance between oncological control and functional preservation. This approach has become technically feasible due to the MRI visibility of clinically significant cancer and precise image-guidance techniques, as well as the development of various ablation technologies. In this review, we provide an overview of MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy and discuss the current status and clinical implications of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer enabled by this imaging-guided approach.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalMultimodal ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsUltrasonography, InterventionalHumansMalefocal therapymagnetic resonance imagingmagnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsyprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID42236170
PMCPMC13542632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.