ArticleHistopathology2026
Spatial transcriptomics reveals clonal relationships between intraductal carcinoma and adjacent invasive prostate cancer.
Article in Histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe pathogenesis of intraductal carcinoma (IDC) is still controversial. Contrary to current opinion, where IDC represents retrograde spread of invasive prostate cancer (PCa), we recently presented an alternative, unifying hypothesis named 'Repetitive Invasion, Precursor Progression' (RIPP). Little is known about genomic alterations in high-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HGPIN), IDC and adjacent invasive PCa. Our objective was to clarify the mutual clonal relationships among HGPIN, IDC, and adjacent PCa using spatial transcriptomics. METHODS AND
resultsRegions of interest containing HGPIN, IDC and adjacent invasive PCa were selected from six Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 radical prostatectomy specimens. Spatial transcriptomic profiling and library preparation were executed according to the Visium workflow. Pathologist-guided manual annotations were utilized to delineate regions of interest for the integrated analysis of chromosomal copy number variants (CNV) and spatiotemporal trajectories. Adjacent HGPIN, IDC and invasive PCa shared common CNV signatures across all samples, with various subclonal events. Unsupervised clonal analysis revealed that across three samples, the adjacent invasive subclone had acquired additional genomic alterations. In two samples, HGPIN, IDC and adjacent invasive PCa had identical CNVs. Finally, in one sample, IDC had additional CNVs compared with HGPIN and invasive glands. Supervised trajectory analysis consistently placed adjacent invasive PCa as the final step in the trajectory, after HGPIN and/or IDC.
conclusionsSpatial transcriptomics revealed strong clonal relationships among adjacent HGPIN, IDC and invasive PCa. Supervised trajectory analysis did not support retrograde spread in this limited number of samples, while unsupervised analysis revealed a complex mutual relationship among HGPIN, IDC and adjacent PCa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.