ArticleBMJ open2026
What are the characteristics and impacts of a patient-led conference? A qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient engagement is the practice of "meaningful and active collaboration [of patient partners] in governance, priority setting, conducting research and knowledge translation." Patient engagement has been implemented in various settings including clinical, research, and quality improvement, with varying levels of patient contributions and decision-making responsibility. However, little is known about the experiences of patient partners who are in leadership roles in patient-led events. For Patients, By Patients (PxP) is an annual, virtual, patient-led conference that focuses on topics important to patient partners in research. Each year's PxP steering committee is comprised of those with patient experiences and consequently, offers an opportunity for our research team to explore patient leadership within a conference setting. Understanding more about the intricacies of patient-led events is necessary if we wish to support patient leadership as a valuable form of patient engagement.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to explore (1) the benefits and challenges experienced by PxP steering committee members in a patient-led event and (2) how to better support patient leadership.
designWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study of semi-structured virtual interviews with PxP conference steering committee members. Thematic analysis was used to identify core themes that were salient to the data.
settingThe Canadian Institutes of Health Research-Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis in Vancouver, Canada, and an international virtual setting via Zoom from January 2025 to April 2025.
participantsPurposive sampling was used to conduct interviews with thirteen PxP patient partner steering committee members.
resultsFour core themes were identified in the data: (1) institutional support: how institutions can support patient leadership, (2) steering committee environmental characteristics: what characteristics are conducive to patient leadership, (3) personal growth: how patient leadership promotes growth among patient partners and (4) new possibilities: how patient-led events foster future expansion and opportunities. Power dynamics, intersectionality, and accessibility were also identified as central to supporting patient leadership and building safe and supportive environments.
conclusionsPatient partners are capable of leading events which promote interpersonal relationships and advance patient engagement practices and governance. Important facilitators include institutional support and governance that considers power dynamics, accessibility and intersectionality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.