ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Working to enhance HIV care: integrating implementation science and improvement science for effective quality improvement - a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHealthcare systems struggle to balance the need for frontline problem-solving with the requirement for theory-driven strategies that ensure sustainable system-wide improvement. Implementation science, improvement science and quality improvement have emerged as complementary approaches to bridge gaps between evidence and practice, yet their integration remains limited. This scoping review examines how these disciplines intersect and can be applied to enhance HIV care delivery.
methodsWe conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed articles published between 2016 and 2025. From an initial identification of 244 articles, 18 core studies were selected for snowball sampling, resulting in a pool of 113. After screening for accessibility and relevance, 30 studies were included in the final review that explicitly addressed overlaps between implementation science, improvement science and quality improvement. Data were charted on study objectives, methodologies, frameworks and relevance to healthcare improvement, and synthesised to identify common themes, models and barriers to integration.
resultsThe integration of these three disciplines creates a robust framework for health system change: implementation science emphasises fidelity and evidence-based uptake, improvement science prioritises generalisable knowledge and quality improvement enables rapid, local problem-solving. Their combined application can enhance the scalability, sustainability and efficiency of interventions. Models such as the HIV/AIDS Bureau Implementation Science Model, Reach-Effectiveness-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance and the Learning Evaluation framework illustrate practical integration, showing how iterative quality improvement efforts can inform broader implementation strategies. Barriers include siloed approaches, variable terminology and limited organisational capacity, highlighting the need for cross-disciplinary collaboration, training and infrastructure support.
conclusionIntegrating implementation science, improvement science and quality improvement provides a pathway to accelerate evidence translation, strengthen system-wide healthcare quality and improve patient-centred outcomes in HIV care. Synthesising shared principles and alignment opportunities offers actionable guidance for healthcare systems seeking to leverage the strengths of each discipline for more effective, scalable and sustainable care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.