Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42235944›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2026

Assessment of Temperature Monitoring Techniques in Neonatal and Juvenile BALB/cJ and C57BL/6J Mice (Mus musculus) as They Age.

Noelle S White, Janiya Allen, Jeannette Delva-Wiley, Katherine Lamont, Sandra Lee, Morika D Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noelle S White1Division of Comparative Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Janiya Allen1Division of Comparative Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Jeannette Delva-Wiley1Division of Comparative Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Katherine Lamont1Division of Comparative Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Sandra Lee5Howard W Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and.
Morika D Williams1Division of Comparative Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body temperature is an important clinical parameter in mice and can help refine humane endpoints in research models. However, due to their small size, accurate measurement of body temperature in neonatal and juvenile mice presents challenges. While rectal temperature is precise, it is invasive and stressful to both neonates and dams. Infrared technologies offer a potential alternative for assessing the body temperature of young mice. This study compared traditional rectal temperature to 3 alternative noninvasive methods: a surface probe and 2 infrared-based approaches (rodent infrared and human infrared). For each alternative method, temperature was measured at 3 different anatomic locations (dorsum, abdomen, and thorax). Temperatures were measured in mice of various ages from postnatal day (PND) 2-42. Temperature measurements were obtained in awake C57BL/6J (n = 114) and BALB/cJ (n = 113) mice to establish baseline neonatal mouse body temperature as they develop thermoregulation. Two strains of mice were used to determine whether coat color impacts infrared temperature readings. Results indicate that body temperature significantly changes as mice age for both strains. Temperatures from all 3 alternative temperature methods at all anatomic locations were significantly lower relative to rectal temperature. The surface probe had little variability among anatomic locations and closely followed the trend of the rectal thermometer with an average difference of 2.1-2.22 °C lower than rectal temperature. Of the methods assessed, the surface probe was the best alternative method to rectal temperature. These results provide valuable baseline data on normal neonatal mouse body temperature for 2 commonly used strains and suggest the surface probe could provide an alternative for body temperature measurement in young mice.

Indexed as

hIR, human infrared thermometerPND, postnatal dayrIR, rodent infrared thermometer

Identifiers

PMID42235944
PMCPMC13446400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.