Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42235124›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Tiny caterpillars assess threats by the footsteps of their enemies.

Emilie Mauduit, Sarah M Matheson, Jayne E Yack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emilie MauduitDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1S 5B6.ORCID 0000-0001-9829-5668
Sarah M MathesonDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1S 5B6.ORCID 0009-0008-1320-9838
Jayne E YackDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1S 5B6.ORCID 0000-0001-9383-6437

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation 9555Carleton UniversityFondation FyssenNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPAS 462247-2014Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2014-05947Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2020-07056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects inhabit complex vibroscapes shaped by substrate-borne vibrations from multiple biotic and abiotic sources. One underappreciated topic is how vibrations function in predator-prey interactions. Tiny warty birch caterpillars (Falcaria bilineata) are known to produce complex vibratory signals to defend leaf-tip territories against conspecifics, raising the question of whether vibratory signalling and sensing also play roles in predator-prey interactions. We staged encounters between resident neonate caterpillars and three natural intruders: conspecifics, ladybird beetle larvae and adult ladybird beetles, while simultaneously recording behaviour and substrate-borne vibrations. Resident caterpillars showed three key responses - vibratory signalling, freezing and dropping - but these responses varied strongly with intruder identity and stage of encounter. Residents signalled vigorously toward conspecifics, with rates escalating as intruders approached their territories. In contrast, encounters with predators evoked predator-specific defensive strategies including freezing and dropping. Adult ladybird beetles, which caused high mortality (43%), elicited rapid escape responses and subsequent territory abandonment, while ladybird beetle larvae, which caused no mortality, triggered slower responses with initial signalling that ceased upon closer approach. Critically, vibrations generated by the 'footsteps' of each approaching intruder type produced distinct vibratory 'signatures', differing in amplitude, spectral and temporal characteristics. Resident caterpillars also initiated defensive responses before physical contact, often when intruders were still centimetres away. Together, these findings demonstrate that these miniature larvae, no larger than ∼1-2 mm, thrive in complex vibroscapes where vibrations not only function to advertise territory ownership against conspecifics but also provide essential early-warning cues enabling sophisticated threat assessment and context-appropriate defensive responses in predator-rich environments.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationColeopteraMothsPredatory BehaviorAnimalsEscape ReactionLarvaVibrationDefensive behaviourDiscriminationPredator–prey interactionTerritorialVibrationVibroscape

Identifiers

PMID42235124
PMCPMC13288082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.