ArticleJMIR diabetes2026
Personalized Type 1 Diabetes Management: Reinforcement Learning-Based Insulin Dosing and Glucose Forecasting.
Article in JMIR diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Optimizing insulin dosing and predicting future glucose levels for people with type 1 diabetes is challenging due to the dynamic nature of glucose metabolism. Traditional static insulin regimens fail to adapt to individual variability in diet, physical activity, stress, and metabolic fluctuations, leading to suboptimal glycemic control. Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a promising alternative by enabling personalized, real-time insulin adjustments that improve the balance between hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Objective: This study aims to develop a deep Q-network (DQN)-based RL system that dynamically personalizes insulin dosing recommendations using continuous glucose monitoring data, meal intake, and physical activity levels. By leveraging real-time data, the model adapts to patients' evolving physiological states, enhancing glucose control and patient safety. Methods: We used the OhioT1DM dataset (2018 and 2020), which includes 8 weeks of continuous glucose measurements, insulin dosing records, and physical activity data for twelve people with type 1 diabetes. The RL agent was designed with a state representation consisting of recent blood glucose levels, insulin doses, and lifestyle factors over a 2-hour window. The 2-hour window was selected based on the known pharmacodynamic profile of rapid-acting insulin (peak action within 90-120 min), as well as the typical lag in glycemic response following meals or exercise. This window size captures both recent and delayed physiological effects while balancing data density and model stability. The action space included discrete insulin dose recommendations (eg, 0.5 U, 1 U, and 1.5 U). A reward function incentivized glucose levels within the target range (70-180 mg/dL) while penalizing extreme deviations. The DQN model was trained to maximize reward by learning optimal dosing strategies through iterative trial and error. Results: Performance evaluation was conducted using both qualitative and quantitative metrics. Time-series analysis compared actual and predicted glucose levels, demonstrating effective glucose regulation. The RL model achieved a mean glucose level of 80.06 mg/dL, with a reward score of 10 during evaluation, indicating that most glucose predictions were maintained within the desired clinical range. This suggests the model has learned to regulate blood glucose effectively through adaptive insulin dosing. The root mean square error (12.39 mg/dL) was slightly higher than the mean absolute error (9.85 mg/dL), indicating stable predictions. Additionally, the percentage time in target range was 64.06%, suggesting that the model-maintained glucose within the clinically safe range for a majority of the time. Conclusions: The DQN-based RL model demonstrated its effectiveness in personalized insulin dosing while minimizing the risk of hypo- and hyperglycemia. This suggests the model has learned to regulate blood glucose effectively through adaptive insulin dosing. This approach represents a significant advancement over conventional methods, offering a scalable and adaptive strategy for real-world diabetes management, along with enhancing clinical trust and transparency through explainability techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.