ArticleBlood advances2026
Real-world treatment patterns of patients with large B-cell lymphoma over time and into a post-CAR T approval era.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Safety and efficacy of allogeneic CD19-directed CAR-T therapy CTX110 in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.Blood advances · 2026Trial
- Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Rituximab, Gemcitabine, and Oxaliplatin in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results From the Phase III, Randomized POLARGO Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Trial
- Mosunetuzumab Plus Polatuzumab Vedotin in Transplant-Ineligible Refractory/Relapsed Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Primary Results of the Phase III SUNMO Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Advancing access to CAR T-cell therapy: insights and real-world experience from a community oncology practice.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractA significant proportion of patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) experience relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease after first-line (1L) therapy. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy is approved for R/R LBCL, yet real-world use remains unclear. This retrospective study evaluated treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients potentially eligible for CAR T in the Flatiron Health Research Database. Patients diagnosed with LBCL from 2011 to 2024 who initiated 1L therapy were assessed. Predictors of mortality before the opportunity to initiate second-line (2L) therapy were evaluated using competing risk regression models. Treatment patterns among subgroups that initiated 2L and third-line (3L) therapy based timing of US Food and Drug Administration indication approvals for CAR T were evaluated and stratified by CAR T fitness using age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score. Among 10 016 patients who initiated 1L therapy, 13% died within 1 year without initiating 2L therapy, and 30% initiated 2L therapy. In competing risk analyses, 11% of patients with an ECOG PS score of 0/1/unknown (combined) died within 12 months of initiating 1L therapy before being able to receive 2L therapy. Among patients deemed eligible and fit for CAR T therapy, 25% received 2L CAR T therapy, and 36% received 3L CAR T therapy. Despite its curative potential, CAR T uptake remains low in potentially eligible patients, with many dying within 1 year of initiating 1L therapy and before the opportunity to receive CAR Ts. Early collaboration between the community oncologist and CAR T center, improved access, and expanded patient awareness strategies are needed to improve CAR T therapy uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.