Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234930›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026

Clinical Note Generation From Doctor-Patient Conversations Using Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Large Language Models: Comparative Study.

Saib Ahmed, Farig Yousuf Sadeque

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saib AhmedDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, BRAC University, Kha 224 Pragati Sarani, Merul Badda, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh, 880 1796965173.ORCID 0009-0000-7204-8378
Farig Yousuf SadequeDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, BRAC University, Kha 224 Pragati Sarani, Merul Badda, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh, 880 1796965173.ORCID 0000-0001-6797-7826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical note documentation is a vital yet time-intensive task in health care. While advancements in natural language processing have transformed many domains, generating accurate summaries of doctor-patient conversations remains underexplored due to the limited availability of open-source datasets. Large language models (LLMs), with their training on vast datasets, present a promising solution to this challenge. Objective: Precision in clinical summarization is crucial, as it directly impacts patient care and safety. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of parameter-efficient, fine-tuned, decoder-only LLMs for clinical note generation from doctor-patient conversations. We focus on assessing medical accuracy, robustness, and the feasibility of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) approaches under practical resource constraints. Methods: We used the Medical Training Summarization Dialog dataset containing 1700 doctor-patient conversations paired with clinical notes. Several decoder-only LLMs, including Mistral, Meditron, and Llama, were fine-tuned using PEFT techniques to reduce computational and memory overhead. Evaluation was performed using standard automatic metrics, including the Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation score and bidirectional encoder representations from transformers score, to assess content overlap and semantic similarity between generated and reference clinical notes. In addition, an expert physician assessed the LLM-generated notes for medical accuracy, completeness, concision, relevance, and clinical coherence and readability. Results: Model performance was evaluated using the Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation score and bidirectional encoder representations from transformers scores, demonstrating that Meditron-7B and Llama3-8B achieved state-of-the-art results among open-source, parameter-efficient, fine-tuned models, with Mistral-7B also performing competitively. The findings indicate that decoder-only LLMs, particularly Llama variants, outperform traditional models. Moreover, fine-tuning with higher quantization has the potential to further enhance performance. Human expert evaluation further indicated that Llama3-8B and Mistral-7B produced clinically coherent and accurate summaries, with Meditron-7B and Llama3-3B also performing reliably across evaluation criteria. The findings suggest that higher quantization during fine-tuning may improve efficiency without substantially compromising performance. Conclusions: This study underscores the potential of the PEFT of decoder-only LLMs to transform clinical workflows by streamlining medical documentation, thereby enabling health care professionals to dedicate more time to patient care. These models offer a scalable and resource-efficient alternative to traditional architectures and have the potential to streamline clinical documentation workflows.

Indexed as

CommunicationLarge Language ModelsNatural Language ProcessingPhysician-Patient RelationsHumansBERTScorebidirectional encoder representations from transformersbidirectional encoder representations from transformers scoreclinical natural language processingclinical NLPdecoder-onlyDialogue2NoteLlamaMeditronMistralnatural language processingRecall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting EvaluationRecall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation scoreROUGE scoresummarizationtransformer

Identifiers

PMID42234930
PMCPMC13232911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.