Trial reportBlood advances2026
Carfilzomib plus induction chemotherapy for children with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02303821 (Phase 1b/2 Study of Carfilzomib in Combination With Induction Chemotherapy in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 1b/2 Study of Carfilzomib in Combination With Induction Chemotherapy in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractWe report outcomes of the phase 2 study combining carfilzomib (CFZ) and VXLD (vincristine, dexamethasone, asparaginase, and daunorubicin; CFZ-VXLD) in heavily pretreated, pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We investigated whether postinduction complete remission (CR) rates after CFZ-VXLD induction are superior to an external real-world control (EC). Patients aged ≥1 month to <21 years with R/R ALL received CFZ-VXLD induction, followed by optional consolidation (experimental arm). The EC arm included similar patients receiving real-world, curative-intent regimens at Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia sites between 2000 and 2023. The primary end point was CR after induction; overall response rate (ORR; CR/CR with partial/incomplete hematologic recovery/CR without platelet recovery) was a secondary end point. Comparative analyses used inverse probability of treatment weighting. Experimental and EC arms included 105 and 140 patients, respectively. CR rates after induction were 14.8% vs 7.8% (odds ratio [OR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-7.66) in patients with B-cell ALL (B-ALL) and 13.6% vs 9.1% (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.47-5.31) in patients with T-cell ALL. There was no statistically significant increase in postinduction CR for the CFZ-VXLD arm vs the EC arm and the study did not meet its primary end point. In patients with B-ALL, ORR was 42.6% vs 26.3%, favoring the CFZ-VXLD arm vs the EC arm. Adverse event rates with CFZ were consistent with previous reports. Overall, the CFZ-VXLD regimen may be an option for some selected pediatric patients with R/R ALL, and this study highlights that novel treatments for R/R ALL remain an area of unmet medical need. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02303821.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.