Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234838›Full record

ReviewBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Network methods for diagonal integration of unpaired single-cell multiomics data: a review.

Marcello Barylli, Joyaditya Saha, Tineke E Buffart, Jan Koster, Kristiaan J Lenos, Louis Vermeulen, Roland V Bumbuc, Vivek M Sheraton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcello BarylliComputational Science Lab, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1098 XH, The Netherlands.
Joyaditya SahaLaboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location VUmc), Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4435-7576
Tineke E BuffartLaboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location VUmc), Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Jan KosterLaboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location VUmc), Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Kristiaan J LenosLaboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location VUmc), Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Louis VermeulenLaboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location VUmc), Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Roland V BumbucComputational Science Lab, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1098 XH, The Netherlands.
Vivek M SheratonComputational Science Lab, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1098 XH, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6577-6016

Funding

Dutch Burns Foundation (DBF)-Health-Holland 22.01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAdvances in single-cell sequencing have enabled multiomics profiling at unprecedented resolution; however, mass spectrometry-based single-cell proteomics (scMS) remains inherently destructive, precluding simultaneous transcriptomic capture. Unlike antibody-based methods such as CITE-seq, which permit paired profiling but are restricted to targeted protein panels, scMS provides unbiased, genome-scale coverage of the intracellular proteome yet necessitates post hoc integration of unpaired datasets. This diagonal integration challenge, where transcriptomes and proteomes are measured in separate cells lacking shared anchors, remains underserved by existing reviews, which focus predominantly on vertical integration strategies enabled by non-destructive assays.

resultsWe survey the complete computational pipeline for constructing mechanistic proteogenomic networks from unpaired single-cell data, covering: (i) unimodal network inference such as knowledge-based approaches, probabilistic graphical models, temporal directionality inference, and generative and foundation model strategies that establish the transcriptomic scaffold; (ii) cross-modal integration architectures such as network propagation, graph neural networks (scMRDR, scmFormer, scCotag), and consensus frameworks designed explicitly for the unpaired proteomics setting; and (iii) benchmarking paradigms spanning network reconstruction (BEELINE, GRETA, CausalBench) and multi-task integration evaluation (scMultiBench, SCMMIB), with guidance on metric selection under network sparsity and class imbalance. We identify three principal axes of future development: generative proteomic translation from transcriptomic precursors, inductive prior embedding in next-generation architectures, and perturbation-based causal benchmarking. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: This is a review article; no novel software is distributed. A curated benchmark resource table, methods starter guide, and per-method bottleneck annotations are provided in the Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteomicsSingle-Cell AnalysisGraph Neural NetworksHumansMultiomicsProteomeTranscriptomeProteome

Identifiers

PMID42234838
PMCPMC13284991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.