Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234818›Full record

ArticleGenetics2026

Benchmarking genomic variant calling tools in inbred mouse strains: recommendations and considerations.

Alexis Garretson, Laura Blanco-Berdugo, Aleisha M G Roberts, Beth L Dumont

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Increased rate ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexis GarretsonGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 136 Harrison Avenue, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7260-0131
Laura Blanco-BerdugoThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-2679-9933
Aleisha M G RobertsDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, Harvard University, 52 Oxford St, Cambridge, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States.
Beth L DumontGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 136 Harrison Avenue, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0918-0389

Funding

Population genomics in laboratory and outbred mouse populationsR35GM133415 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BETHANY L DUMONT · 2019 to 2026
$3.1M
National Science Foundation Graduate Research FellowshipNIGMS NIH HHS R35GM133415NSF CAREER AwardTufts Graduate School of Biomedical Science's Dean's Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the growing affordability of whole-genome sequencing, variant identification has become an increasingly common task in modern genomics. In recent years, the number of software packages available for variant calling has rapidly increased. Understanding the benefits and drawbacks of different tools is important in setting leading practices. These considerations are especially crucial in model organism research, as many variant calling tools assume outbred genomes and implicit heterozygosity, conditions that do not apply to inbred laboratory models. Here, we present an analysis of multiple widely used variant calling tools and their performance in the simulated genomes of the C57BL/6J inbred laboratory mouse and 9 non-reference strains. Our findings reveal a tradeoff between the recall and precision of different tools. Balancing these considerations, we show that an optimal variant call set is obtained by using an ensemble approach focused on the intersection of variants reported by multiple callers. However, specific variant calling recommendations vary by strain and analytical goals. Further, we identify empirical filters for improving the performance of different variant calling tools, both for the discovery of rare variants and in the identification of strain polymorphisms. Overall, our simulation-based analysis provides best practices for calling and filtering genomic variants in inbred organisms, particularly laboratory mice.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenomicsSoftwareAnimalsBenchmarkingGenomeMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred StrainsWhole Genome Sequencing129S1/SvImJA/JCAST/EiJDBA/2Jgenetic variationmammalian genomesnext-generation sequencingNOD/ShiLtJNZO/HlLtJPWK/PhJshort-read datasimulationsingle nucleotide variantsSPRET/EiJvariant callingWSB/EiJ

Identifiers

PMID42234818
PMCPMC13334110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.