Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234738›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Information theory for hypergraph similarity.

Helcio Felippe, Alec Kirkley, Federico Battiston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helcio FelippeDepartment of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4204-0794
Alec KirkleyInstitute of Data Science, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9966-0807
Federico BattistonDepartment of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9646-6232

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparing networks is essential for a number of downstream tasks, from clustering to anomaly detection. Despite higher-order interactions being critical for understanding the dynamics of complex systems, traditional approaches for network comparison are limited to pairwise interactions only. Here, we construct a general information theoretic framework for hypergraph similarity, capturing meaningful correspondence among higher-order interactions while correcting for spurious correlations. Our method operationalizes any notion of structural overlap among hypergraphs as a principled normalized mutual information measure, allowing us to derive a hierarchy of increasingly granular formulations of similarity among hypergraphs within and across orders of interactions and at multiple scales. We validate these measures through extensive experiments on synthetic hypergraphs and apply the framework to reveal meaningful patterns in a variety of empirical higher-order networks. Our work provides foundational tools for the principled comparison of higher-order networks, shedding light on the structural organization of networked systems with nondyadic interactions.

Identifiers

PMID42234738
PMCPMC13232591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.