ArticlePloS one2026
Menstrual hygiene management practices after the chhaugoth demolition campaign in Achham, Nepal.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMenstruation, also called as Chhau (in Sudurpaschim and Karnali provinces of Nepal); is inextricably connected to social taboos and stigma in Nepal. Women who menstruate known as "Chhaupadi", are traditionally bound to stay in secluded huts called Chhaugoth during their menstrual periods and after child birth. Such practices have adverse social, economic and health consequences. Although Chhaupadi is legally punishable in Nepal; this practice remains prevalent. In 2017, the Government of Nepal launched the Chhaugoth demolition campaign to eliminate this practices. In this context, this study aimed to identify the menstrual hygiene management practices after the Chhaugoth Demolition Campaign in Chaurpati Rural Municipality of Achham district, Nepal.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional quantitative study; conducted among 385 resident girls and women of the Chaurpati Rural Municipality, Achham who were in the menstrual life span (menarche to pre- menopause). A multistage sampling technique was used to select respondents from the six wards of Chaurpati Rural Municipality. Data were collected through individual interview using KOBO toolbox. Data were analyzed using IBM's SPSS 21. Ethical approval was obtained from IRC of Pokhara University. Appropriate descriptive statistics such as mean/median and SD were applied.
resultsMost of the participants (93.5%) reported that existing Chhaugoths in their communities had been demolished. Consequently, 85.5% now reside in separate rooms at home during menstruation. However, 11% still use Chhaugoths, often covertly. Participants reported improved living arrangements (30.8%); yet menstrual hygiene management (MHM) practices remained poor. While, 48.6% used sanitary pads, disposal practices remained suboptimal, with 29.1% burned pads and 15.1% dumped them directly in water sources posing environmental health risks.
conclusionThis study demonstrates progress in shifting women from hazardous menstrual seclusion to safer, in-house accommodations following the Chhaugoth demolition campaign. However, critical gaps persist in menstrual waste disposal and supportive infrastructure. To achieve sustainable menstrual dignity and equity, interventions must combine targeted behavior change communication with early, pre-menarche education, to foster generational shifts in practices and norms. Further, studies explaining the factors associated with successful implementation of interventions and their effectiveness constitute the future scope of the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.