Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234695›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

A snapshot of selected neglected tropical disease research using the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform database, 1999-2023.

Rhys Peploe, Hannah Jauncey, Yurika Sakai, Ghassan Karam, Anna Laura Ross, Sarah C Charnaud, Prabin Dahal, Anthony W Solomon, Philippe J Guerin, Caitlin Naylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rhys PeploeInfectious Diseases Data Observatory, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1669-3716
Hannah JaunceyInfectious Diseases Data Observatory, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Yurika SakaiInfectious Diseases Data Observatory, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ghassan KaramWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anna Laura RossWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sarah C CharnaudWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Prabin DahalInfectious Diseases Data Observatory, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Anthony W SolomonWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Philippe J GuerinInfectious Diseases Data Observatory, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Caitlin NaylorInfectious Diseases Data Observatory, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge of clinical study methodology and location can inform researchers, clinicians, funders, and policymakers of the gaps which exist in a disease's evidence landscape, thereby conferring guidance for appropriate resource allocation. This study summarises registered studies for selected neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) and identifies evidence gaps. METHODOLOGY: The International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) was searched in September 2023 to extract 315 clinical study registrations submitted between January 1999 and September 2023 on Chagas disease, schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiases, and visceral leishmaniasis. Data were standardised before a descriptive analysis was performed on study location, inclusion age range, study design, phase, and population access to studies.

resultsRegistered studies were partially aligned to the geographical distribution of disease burden; countries in which the highest number of studies were registered often face great burden, though there were several endemic countries with few or no studies. The number of registered studies increased over time in the period covered by the review, with 51-62% of studies across the 4 diseases conducted in 2014-23 period, as opposed to 42%-49% in the preceding 15 years. Only 12-17% of studies were multi-country studies across the 4 NTDs. 14% of Chagas disease studies included children under the age of 16 years (much lower than other NTDs) and only 2 studies (2%) exclusively studied under 16s.

conclusionsThese findings highlight areas of research for these diseases which have been neglected between 1999-2023, indicating need for further research to fill these gaps and aid progress towards the World Health Organization's roadmaps to elimination of NTDs by 2030.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchNeglected DiseasesRegistriesTropical MedicineChagas DiseaseClinical Trials as TopicDatabases, FactualHumansSchistosomiasisWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID42234695
PMCPMC13232815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.