ArticlePloS one2026
Salivary osmolality measured by MX3 hydration testing system demonstrates high reliability but limited validity in elite athlete hydration assessment.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of hydration is essential for both athletic performance and health, yet remains challenging outside controlled settings. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of salivary osmolality (SOSM), measured using a handheld osmometer (MX3 Hydration Testing System), as a marker of morning hydration status in elite athletes. A total of 230 paired fasted-morning saliva and urine sample sets from 118 Olympic-level athletes (57% female; age 27 ± 5 years; BMI 24 ± 2) were included in the analyses. Urine specific gravity (USG) served as the reference. Validity was examined using ICC(3,1), ROC analysis, and Cohen's κ, and test-retest reliability was assessed from three repeated SOSM readings from the same saliva sample. SOSM showed no meaningful correspondence with USG (ICC = 0.00; 95% CI [-0.13, 0.13]) and no meaningful classification agreement (κ = -0.02; 95% CI [-0.15, 0.10]). Diagnostic accuracy was poor across all examined threshold comparisons, with AUCs of 0.40-0.49, indicating chance-level to worse-than-chance discrimination, sensitivity 40-69%, and specificity 23-65%. By contrast, within-sample repeated SOSM measurements were highly consistent (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI [0.91, 0.94]), with a standard error of measurement of 7.9 mOsm and a minimal detectable change (MDC90) of 18.4 mOsm. These findings indicate that the MX3 device is repeatable when reading the same saliva sample, but SOSM lacks validity as a stand-alone marker of first-morning hydration status in elite athletes under free-living conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.