ArticlePloS one2026
Comparative unfolding of the Trp-cage miniprotein in anionic and cationic surfactants.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of anionic sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and cationic cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) surfactants on the stability of the Trp-cage miniprotein in aqueous solution at varying concentrations and temperatures. Conformational dynamics were analyzed using principal component-based free-energy landscapes, cluster population analysis, and radial distribution functions. The results show that at 25 °C in water, the protein adopts a compact native basin, whereas at 100 °C it exhibits expanded conformational space with multiple metastable states. The presence of surfactants further modulates this behavior in a concentration-dependent manner. Cluster population analysis shows that SDS promotes a highly heterogeneous ensemble characterized by reduced dominance of the native-like cluster, while CTAB partially protects the protein from thermal denaturation at higher concentrations. Radial distribution functions demonstrate strong accumulation of SDS headgroups around the protein and pronounced insertion of SDS alkyl tails into hydrophobic protein regions, indicating direct hydrophobic destabilization and micelle-assisted unfolding. In contrast, CTAB exhibits weaker headgroup association owing to electrostatic repulsion and reduced tail-hydrophobic contacts, suggesting a less disruptive interaction mechanism. At high concentration, CTAB aggregates provide a structured hydrophobic environment that stabilizes the folded state and suppresses denaturation. Together, these results provide a molecular-level picture of how surfactant chemistry and concentration govern the conformational stability of a cationic protein, highlighting the dominant role of hydrophobic interactions in surfactant-induced denaturation at high temperature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.