ArticlePloS one2026
Task demands and visual context naturalness modulate gravitational expectation during ocular tracking of temporarily occluded ballistic trajectories.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interception of visible and occluded ballistic trajectories: differential contributions by areas MT/V5, V6, V6A and the vestibular premotor cortex evaluated by TMS.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When intercepting a moving object, ocular and hand movements are often associated. The neural control of both tasks is known to combine sensory information with predictive mechanisms. When interacting with free-falling targets, the brain may integrate visual signals with an internal representation of gravity, which can be recruited also in virtual settings, when contextual cues about the environment naturalness are available. This internal representation may be shared between oculomotor and manual control. At the same time, concurrent execution of hand and eye movements may alter the oculomotor performance. Here, we investigated how task demands and visual context naturalness affected the relative weighting of sensory feedback and predictive information for ocular tracking control. Participants tracked targets, either congruent with gravity or perturbed with altered gravity, which were projected on either pictorial or neutral background. To enforce prediction, targets were occluded for variable intervals. One group of participants performed only ocular tracking, while another group also intercepted the targets. In general, subjects' ocular tracking depended on the target acceleration and the visual context. The effects of gravitational expectations were more evident for the time dependent oculomotor indexes (smooth pursuit and saccadic τ) and with the pictorial background, reinforcing the idea that recruitment of the gravity prior depends on the visual context. Instead, for post saccadic error and smooth pursuit gain no clear dissociation emerged between the effects of acceleration and velocity. Finally, participants who only tracked the target showed strong reliance on gravitational expectation early on, by displaying systematic oculomotor changes with the target acceleration since its perturbation. Instead, participants that also intercepted the target relied less on the gravity prior until the target occlusion, after which they showed oculomotor performance compatible with gravitational expectation. Thus, concurrence of ocular tracking and manual interception strongly influenced the temporal recruitment of the gravity prior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.