ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Benchmarking deep learning methods for Cα atom prediction in cryo-EM density maps.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationWith the advancement of cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) into the atomic resolution era, accurate Cα atom modeling has become essential for macromolecular structure determination. However, existing evaluation systems overly rely on full-atom metrics and lack a dedicated, comprehensive benchmark for assessing Cα prediction modules within automated modeling tools.
resultsTo address this gap, we establish a rigorous benchmark to evaluate the Cα prediction performance of four prominent deep learning-based methods (ModelAngelo, DeepMainMast, EModelX, and CryoAtom) across multiple dimensions. We construct a diverse dataset covering a wide range of resolutions (1-8 Å), molecular weights, and noise levels. A novel evaluation framework is introduced, incorporating multi-threshold RMSD-based metrics (1-3 Å) alongside advanced point-cloud similarity measures (Chamfer Distance, Earth Mover's Distance) for quantitative and nuanced assessment. Our results reveal that method performance is highly dependent on the chosen evaluation criteria and intrinsic data characteristics. ModelAngelo excels under loose thresholds with high-quality data but shows sensitivity to resolution degradation; CryoAtom demonstrates notable computational efficiency, however, its completeness-oriented design leads to a certain loss of precision; EModelX demonstrates balanced generalization across varied conditions; DeepMainMast achieves high localization accuracy under stringent criteria but incurs a high computational cost. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: This work provides a reproducible, Cα-centric evaluation framework to guide method development and advance automated cryo-EM structure determination. The source code for the benchmark and evaluation metrics is freely available at https://github.com/zhtianz/Benchmarking\_CA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.