Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234518›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Benchmarking deep learning methods for Cα atom prediction in cryo-EM density maps.

Tian Zhang, Zhe Liu, Yiqing Ma, Chenjie Feng, Renmin Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tian ZhangResearch Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences; Cheeloo College of Medicine, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.
Zhe LiuResearch Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences; Cheeloo College of Medicine, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.
Yiqing MaResearch Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences; Cheeloo College of Medicine, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.
Chenjie FengCollege of Medical Information and Engineering, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China.
Renmin HanResearch Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences; Cheeloo College of Medicine, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4761-6526

Funding

Foundation of Ningxia Province 2024BEH04022Foundation of Ningxia Province 2026AAC040016Fundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFF0704300National Natural Science Foundation of China 12501589National Natural Science Foundation of China 32241027National Natural Science Foundation of China 62472034National Natural Science Foundation of China 624B2089National Natural Science Foundation of China W2511070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationWith the advancement of cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) into the atomic resolution era, accurate Cα atom modeling has become essential for macromolecular structure determination. However, existing evaluation systems overly rely on full-atom metrics and lack a dedicated, comprehensive benchmark for assessing Cα prediction modules within automated modeling tools.

resultsTo address this gap, we establish a rigorous benchmark to evaluate the Cα prediction performance of four prominent deep learning-based methods (ModelAngelo, DeepMainMast, EModelX, and CryoAtom) across multiple dimensions. We construct a diverse dataset covering a wide range of resolutions (1-8 Å), molecular weights, and noise levels. A novel evaluation framework is introduced, incorporating multi-threshold RMSD-based metrics (1-3 Å) alongside advanced point-cloud similarity measures (Chamfer Distance, Earth Mover's Distance) for quantitative and nuanced assessment. Our results reveal that method performance is highly dependent on the chosen evaluation criteria and intrinsic data characteristics. ModelAngelo excels under loose thresholds with high-quality data but shows sensitivity to resolution degradation; CryoAtom demonstrates notable computational efficiency, however, its completeness-oriented design leads to a certain loss of precision; EModelX demonstrates balanced generalization across varied conditions; DeepMainMast achieves high localization accuracy under stringent criteria but incurs a high computational cost. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: This work provides a reproducible, Cα-centric evaluation framework to guide method development and advance automated cryo-EM structure determination. The source code for the benchmark and evaluation metrics is freely available at https://github.com/zhtianz/Benchmarking\_CA.

Indexed as

Cryoelectron MicroscopyDeep LearningBenchmarkingModels, Molecular

Identifiers

PMID42234518
PMCPMC13264388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.