ArticleJAMA network open2026
Perspectives on Attrition Among Emergency Physicians.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Physician attrition has dramatically increased, and emergency physician attrition threatens safety-net stability. Understanding key factors associated with attrition is necessary to develop structural interventions to promote career longevity. Objective: To examine why emergency physicians leave and to develop strategies to promote retention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national qualitative study took place from August 8, 2024, to April 11, 2025, and involved semistructured video interviews with board-certified or board-eligible emergency physicians who had either left clinical emergency medicine or seriously contemplated leaving. Participants were recruited via social media, residency alumni networks, and snowball sampling, with purposive sampling by gender, community vs academic practice, region, and years in practice. Main Outcomes and Measures: Key themes associated with attrition and potential strategies for retention were identified through iterative thematic analysis. Results: Among 46 participants, 28 (61%) were women, and 24 (53%) were community based, with a median (IQR) of 6 (4-10) years in practice. Most (34 participants [74%]) no longer practiced emergency medicine; 9 (19%) practiced emergency medicine part-time, and 3 (6%) practiced emergency medicine full-time. Physicians described a growing mismatch between increasing clinical demands and stagnant resources that prevented them from providing safe, high-quality patient care. These tensions were aggravated by the persistent emphasis on volume, efficiency, and patient satisfaction over safety and clinical outcomes. Physicians described pervasive disrespect, interpersonal conflict, and devaluation of the work of emergency medicine. Institutional responses promoting individual resilience exacerbated distress. Limited opportunities for growth and rigid career structures demanding the same intensity of shifts across life stages led to feelings of stagnancy even among those with fewer negative experiences. Women more frequently described gender inequities in advancement and inadequate support for new parents as drivers of attrition. Participants identified improved staffing, less emphasis on throughput and satisfaction, career flexibility to support life phases and caregiving, mentorship, opportunities for professional growth, and gender equity in advancement as strategies to enhance retention. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study, emergency physicians felt driven out by structural health system failures, including misaligned incentives and inadequate resources. Institutional accountability for adequate staffing, metrics prioritizing safety over throughput and satisfaction, and career adaptability across life stages may promote retention and access to high-quality emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.