ArticleEJNMMI physics2026
The impact of scan time on dynamic [Formula: see text]-FAPI-04 total-body PET parametric imaging generated by deep learning models.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo date, some studies have employed deep learning techniques to directly generate dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) parametric images from static PET. Compared with traditional methods, this approach requires only a single PET/computed tomography (CT) scan. However, current methods tend to employ static PET images captured at fixed scanning times without considering whether static PET images acquired at different scanning times impact the quality of the dynamic PET parametric images generated via deep learning.
methodsA single-frame image from dynamic [Formula: see text]-FAPI-04 total-body PET can actually be regarded as a static PET image acquired during that specific period of the PET/CT scan. We extracted 5 frames of dynamic [Formula: see text]-FAPI-04 total-body PET at equal intervals, specifically frames 50, 76, 80, 86, and 92. Each frame of the dynamic [Formula: see text]-FAPI-04 total-body PET images was subsequently input into the deep learning model to obtain dynamic [Formula: see text]-FAPI-04 total-body PET parametric images. By comparing and analyzing the quality of dynamic PET parametric images, we attempted to determine the optimal scan time for static PET.
resultsThe experimental results revealed that the dynamic [Formula: see text]-FAPI-04 total-body PET parametric image generated from the 58th frame of the dynamic PET image via the deep learning model exhibited the poorest performance. This may be because the diffusion of the radioactive tracer was not stable at the time of PET/CT scanning in frame 58, but it was relatively stable from frames 70-92.
conclusionStatic PET images acquired at different scanning times do indeed affect the quality of the dynamic [Formula: see text]-FAPI-04 total-body PET parametric images generated via deep learning. Specifically, when the radioactive tracer is unstable during the early stage of scanning, the quality of the dynamic [Formula: see text]-FAPI-04 total-body PET parametric images generated from static PET images via deep learning appears to be inferior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.