Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234349›Full record

Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2026

Impact of age on the prognostic benefit of follow-up in UMIPIC units: analysis of the RICA registry.

Pau Llàcer, François Croset, Álvaro González Franco, José Manuel Cerqueiro, Manuel Méndez, Manuel Montero-Pérez-Barquero, José Pérez Silvestre, Alicia Conde, Melitón Dávila, Margarita Carrera and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pau LlàcerInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain. paullacer@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-0599
François CrosetInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
Álvaro González FrancoInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
José Manuel CerqueiroInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Manuel MéndezInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clinico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Montero-Pérez-BarqueroInternal Medicine Department, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
José Pérez SilvestreInternal Medicine Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Alicia CondeInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.
Melitón DávilaInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Nuestra señora de la candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Margarita CarreraInternal Medicine Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Soria, Soria, Spain.
Fernando AguilarInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo Martínez LitagoInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Santa Bárbara de Puertollano, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Francesc FormigaInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Luis ManzanoInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multidisciplinary management programs are recommended for patients with heart failure (HF), yet it remains uncertain whether their prognostic benefits extend uniformly across all ages, particularly among the very elderly. This study evaluated whether age modifies the benefit of follow-up in UMIPIC (Comprehensive Management Unit for Patients with Heart Failure), using data from the Spanish RICA registry. We conducted a prospective, multicenter cohort study including 5644 patients (mean age 79.9±8.6 years; 52.7% women) hospitalized for acute HF and followed for one year. Patients were managed either within UMIPIC units or with conventional care. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and HF readmissions. Cox regression models tested the interaction between UMIPIC and age, modeled categorically (<90 vs ≥90 years), continuously, and with restricted cubic splines. During a median follow-up of 363 days, 1.419 patients (25.1%) died and 1.287 (22.8%) were rehospitalized for HF. In multivariable Cox models, UMIPIC participation was independently associated with lower mortality, with a significant age interaction (p=0.026). Among patients, 90 years, UMIPIC follow-up reduced mortality by 40% (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.50-0.73; p<0.001), with consistent benefit across age groups (p for interaction=0.971). UMIPIC follow-up was associated with lower mortality and rehospitalization in older adults with HF. The survival benefit was most pronounced among nonagenarians, supporting the inclusion of very old patients in multidisciplinary HF programs.

Indexed as

Age FactorsHeart FailureAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRegistriesSpainAcute heart failureAgeInteractionPrognosisUMIPIC

Identifiers

PMID42234349
PMCPMC13582026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.