Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234280›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2026

Influence of substrate thickness on cell-perceived stiffness: a computational study.

Raphael Jakob, Alexander E Ehret, Edoardo Mazza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raphael JakobInstitute for Mechanical Systems, ETH Zurich, CH-8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Alexander E EhretInstitute for Mechanical Systems, ETH Zurich, CH-8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Edoardo MazzaInstitute for Mechanical Systems, ETH Zurich, CH-8092, Zürich, Switzerland. mazza@imes.mavt.ethz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell culturing on soft substrates has become a widely applied method towards mimicking the compliant mechanical environment of cells in vivo, and substrate stiffness was shown to influence cell behavior. The cell-perceived stiffness, however, does not only depend on the modulus of the substrate material, but also on its thickness. In the present work, we propose an in silico approach to quantify the effect of substrate thickness on cell-perceived substrate stiffness. We coupled a discrete network representation of the cellular cytoskeleton including subcellular cell-substrate connections, i.e. focal adhesions (FA), with a continuum model of the substrate, and simulated the contraction of individual cells and cell patches. The results indicate that for substrates of heights larger than a multiple of the FA size (i.e. in the range of 5-10

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCytoskeletonFocal AdhesionsModels, BiologicalCell-perceived substrate stiffnessCell-perceived substrate thicknessCell-substrate depth sensingHybrid discrete-continuum model

Identifiers

PMID42234280
PMCPMC13675283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.