ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2026
Multi-scale modelling of mouse tibia loading reveals the critical role of muscle insertion surfaces.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The definition of the muscle insertion surface (MIS) is often simplified in micro-finite element (micro-FE) models despite its potential impact on the predictions of mechanical properties that are relevant to bone adaptation. This study investigated the effect of MIS size on local strain energy density (SED) in the mouse tibia. Micro-FE models of six mouse tibiae were developed from micro-CT images, and loading conditions were derived from musculoskeletal simulations of trotting gait. For the seven muscles with the highest contributions to tibial loading, three MIS configurations were tested: full anatomical surface, 50% reduced surface, and a single-node application. A total of 198 micro-FE models were run, both for individual muscle applications and multi-muscle configurations at key instants of the stance phase. SED values were compared across MIS conditions using the mean absolute difference, normalised by the median, mean, or 95th percentile of the SED. Significant differences in SED were observed between MIS configurations, with the largest effects near the MIS and boundary conditions. The effect of MIS modification on SED values was heterogeneous across the different muscles, highlighting the importance of anatomical features. Even with multiple muscle loading, SED differences exceeded 20% in most comparisons. These results demonstrate that simplifications of the MIS, especially to single-node applications, can considerably alter local SED predictions and are likely to compromise the accuracy of bone adaptation models. Accurate representation of the MIS is therefore essential for reliable mechanoregulation analysis and should be prioritised in multiscale models of skeletal loading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.