Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234224›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2026

Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can increase the concentration of per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances in cereal crops.

Stephanie J Watts-Williams, Sara Thomas, Alison R Gill, Thi Diem Nguyen, Shervin Kabiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie J Watts-WilliamsCentre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, 6708 PE, The Netherlands. stephanie.watts-fawkes@wur.nl.
Sara ThomasThe Waite Research Institute, The School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Adelaide University, Waite Campus, Urrbrae, South Australia, Australia.
Alison R GillThe Waite Research Institute, The School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Adelaide University, Waite Campus, Urrbrae, South Australia, Australia.
Thi Diem NguyenThe Waite Research Institute, The School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Adelaide University, Waite Campus, Urrbrae, South Australia, Australia.
Shervin KabiriThe Waite Research Institute, The School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Adelaide University, Waite Campus, Urrbrae, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council DE210100908Australian Research Council DE240100756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contamination of agricultural soils with per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) is now widespread and common throughout the world due to management practices such as biosolid application. Crop and pasture plants can readily take up and accumulate PFAS in their tissues, which eventually end up in food products or livestock feed and lead to health issues. This study investigated how arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi affect plant PFAS uptake in three important cereal crop species (barley, bread wheat, durum wheat), using a combination of soils that were artificially spiked or naturally contaminated with PFAS. Spiking soil with PFAS did not interfere with AM colonisation of roots, nor did it detrimentally affect plant biomass. However, the shoots of all three plant species accumulated high concentrations of multiple short- and long-chain PFAS compounds. Inoculation with AM fungi led to increased concentration of all measured PFAS compounds in durum wheat shoots, the highest being PFBS at 5.2 ng g

Indexed as

Edible GrainMycorrhizaeSoil PollutantsTriticumHordeumPlant RootsPlant ShootsSoilSoil MicrobiologySoilSoil PollutantsBarleyBread wheatDurum wheatPFASSoil contamination

Identifiers

PMID42234224
PMCPMC13234039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.