Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234221›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2026

Meniscus Pathology in the Setting of Revision ACL Surgery: Unique Considerations.

Adam V Daniel, Sophia Mavrommatis, Aaron J Krych, Patrick A Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam V DanielOrlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, FL, 32806, USA.
Sophia MavrommatisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Aaron J KrychDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Patrick A SmithHospital for Special Surgery at Naples Comprehensive Health, Naples, FL, 34110, USA. p.allensmith24@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSimilar to primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), meniscal pathology is frequently encountered during revision ACLR (RACLR). In the revision setting, however, meniscal disease often presents a greater challenge because tissue quality may be compromised, particularly when prior meniscal treatment was performed at the index ACLR. This review highlights key considerations and treatment strategies for managing extensive, complex meniscal lesions in the setting of RACLR. RECENT

findingsGraft failure significantly increases the incidence of meniscal tears. Furthermore, graft insufficiency may result in extensive, complex, and sometimes, irreparable meniscal tears. Meniscal treatment strategies, and ultimately joint preservation, have been studied to restore appropriate knee anatomy and biomechanics. Furthermore, special considerations must be made to best treat a wide range of meniscal pathologies in the RACLR, especially in a suboptimal joint environment. Graft failure requiring revision ACL reconstruction is often accompanied by extensive, complex meniscal tearing. Meniscus-preserving strategies may help restore knee anatomy and biomechanics and, in turn, may slow the progression of osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

Meniscal preservationMeniscusOsteoarthritisRevision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42234221
PMCPMC13234055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.